Most spending decisions involve conflict in one form or another. Even ordinary decisions like whether to dine out or eat at home can create conflict. Research on self-control typically studies conflicts resulting from tradeoffs between product quality and price (Haws and Poyner 2008; Okada 2005; Wilcox et al. 2011)—situations where consumers contemplate purchasing attractive products that are considered indulgent, frivolous expenses (Kivetz and Simonson 2002). Oftentimes, however, consumers’ spending conflicts involve quality and quantity. Quantity-quality tradeoffs occur when consumers decide between higher-quality products in smaller numbers versus lower-quality products in greater numbers. For example, buying a single pair of designer brand shoes or spending the same amount of money on multiple pairs of non-designer brand shoes. Quality-quantity tradeoffs also occur when consumers decide between higher-quality products in smaller volume versus lower-quality products in larger volume. For instance, for the same price, consumers can buy a small jar of premium mustard versus a larger bottle of regular mustard, or a standard-sized bottle of a national brand of shampoo versus a jumbo-sized bottle of a generic brand. In such situations, tension results from the desire for better quality versus greater quantity.